The Critical Reasoning (CR) in CLAT plays a crucial role in testing your ability to understand, analyze, and evaluate arguments. Found within the Logical Reasoning section, CLAT critical reasoning questions are designed to assess how well you can think logically, draw conclusions, and identify assumptions or flaws in arguments.
This section has the potential to determine the edge between an average and a top-rank score. Let’s understand what critical reasoning in CLAT involves, the common types of topics and questions asked, and proven tips to help you master this section with confidence.
What is Critical Reasoning in CLAT?
Critical Reasoning in CLAT tests your ability to analyze arguments, spot assumptions, draw inferences, and reach logical conclusions. It’s not just about reading comprehension; it’s about going one step further to measure how well you can think critically and logically.
Since law as a profession thrives on sharp reasoning, mastering this section is crucial. The CLAT exam uses it to reflect the very skills that will later shape your journey in legal studies and practice.
Upcoming CLAT Exams:
How Critical Reasoning Matters for Law?
Take a look at how critical reasoning comes into play in real legal scenarios:
- Case Analysis: When lawyers study past cases, they don’t just read judgments. They critically break down arguments, assess the evidence, and evaluate the reasoning behind the verdict to understand how it impacts their current case.
- Contract Review: Every contract is basically a set of arguments written into clauses. A good lawyer uses critical reasoning to spot loopholes, vague terms, or hidden assumptions that might cause disputes later.
- Legal Arguments: Whether drafting a court brief or arguing before a judge, lawyers lean on critical reasoning to build strong, persuasive arguments. They gather facts, anticipate counterpoints, and present a clear, logical case that convinces the courtroom.
CLAT Critical Reasoning Important Topics
Critical Reasoning questions for CLAT 2026 focus on arguments, assumptions, and conclusions. They test how well you can understand an argument, identify its assumptions, evaluate its strength, and draw logical conclusions from the given passage.
Some of the key topics you need to prepare include:
- Statement and Argument: Understand how statements support or contradict arguments.
- Statement and Assumption: Identify the unstated assumptions behind given statements.
- Statement and Conclusion: Determine the logical conclusions that can be drawn from given statements.
- Statement and Course of Action: Evaluate the most appropriate course of action based on given statements.
- Cause and Effect: Understand the cause-and-effect relationships within arguments.
- Logical Connectives: Master the use of logical connectives like ‘and’, ‘or’, ‘if-then’, and ‘only if’.
- Degree of Truth and Falsity: Assess the degree of truth or falsity in given statements or arguments.
Read more about CLAT Maths syllabus in detail
Types of Critical Reasoning Questions in CLAT
To master Critical Reasoning in CLAT, you first need to understand the types of questions that appear in this section. Each question format checks a different aspect of your logical and analytical ability. Let’s go through them one by one.
1. Argument Evaluation
These questions ask you to test the strength of an argument. You need to check its validity, find hidden assumptions, and evaluate the quality of evidence.
Example:
Argument: “Many people claim that playing video games improves cognitive skills because it requires quick thinking. Therefore, video games should be added to the school curriculum.”
Question: Which option most seriously weakens the argument?
a) Studies show excessive gaming can cause addiction and poor academic performance.
b) Some video games are only for entertainment.
c) Most teachers believe traditional methods are better.
d) Video games can be expensive.
Answer: (a) weakens the argument directly, since it highlights a negative outcome of gaming.
2. Drawing Inferences and Conclusions
Here, you need to “read between the lines” and identify what logically follows from the given statements.
Example:
Statement: “All members of the hiking club must bring their own water bottles. Some forget and rely on others for water.”
Question: What can be inferred?
a) Some members don’t follow rules.
b) Everyone always brings extra water.
c) The club provides bottles to members.
d) Forgetting leads to reliance on others.
Answer: (d) logically follows from the statement.
3. Statement, Assumption, and Conclusion
These questions test whether you can spot hidden assumptions, identify suitable arguments, or draw conclusions from given facts.
Example:
Statement: “Raising the price of gasoline will reduce traffic congestion.”
Question: What assumption does this rely on?
a) Higher prices will push people toward public transport.
b) The government wants less congestion.
c) There are no other ways to reduce traffic.
d) Everyone can afford the price hike.
Answer: (a) is correct because it assumes higher costs will change behavior.
4. Strengthening or Weakening the Argument
You’ll be asked to add information that either supports or undermines the argument’s claim.
Example:
Argument: “A four-day workweek will boost productivity because employees will be more rested.”
Question: Which option strengthens the argument?
a) Studies show work-life balance improves productivity.
b) Employees may need longer hours daily.
c) Some employees prefer a five-day week.
d) Operational costs may rise.
Answer: (a) provides evidence that supports the claim.
5. Supplying the Assumption or Conclusion
These questions ask you to fill in the missing piece of an argument—either the assumption or the logical conclusion.
Example:
Argument: “The city’s ban on cars in downtown will lower pollution.”
Question: Which assumption is necessary?
a) People will follow the ban.
b) The city will provide public transport.
c) Downtown pollution is already high.
d) Businesses won’t be affected.
Answer: (a) is correct because the ban works only if people comply.
Explore the CLAT marking scheme in detail!
6. Flaws in the Argument
You’ll need to identify mistakes or weak reasoning in the given argument.
Example:
Argument: “Fast food is unhealthy because large portions cause overeating.”
Question: What’s the flaw?
a) Assumes all fast food portions are the same.
b) Ignores nutritional value.
c) Overlooks healthier choices at fast food places.
d) Assumes overeating is only about portion size.
Answer: (d) is correct, since it narrows overeating to just one cause.
7. Paradox Questions
These involve solving contradictions that seem illogical at first but make sense when explained.
Example:
Statement: “People join social media to feel connected, but the more time they spend on it, the lonelier they feel.”
Question: How can this paradox be explained?
a) People use social media for many reasons.
b) Online interactions are less meaningful than face-to-face ones.
c) Loneliness is subjective.
d) Social media encourages superficial connections.
Answer: (b) resolves the paradox by showing why online connections don’t reduce loneliness.
8. Evaluating the Conclusion
Here, you check if the conclusion logically follows from the given premises.
Example:
Argument: “All athletes must be fit. John is an athlete. Therefore, John is fit.”
Question: How should the conclusion be evaluated?
a) Valid, because it follows logically.
b) Invalid, because it assumes all athletes perform well.
c) Valid, because being an athlete means being fit.
d) Invalid, because not all athletes may be fit.
Answer: (a) since the conclusion directly follows the premises.
9. Structure of the Argument
These questions test whether you can break an argument into its basic parts—premises and conclusion.
Example:
Argument: “If it rains, the match will be canceled. It is raining. Therefore, the match will be canceled.”
Question: What describes the structure?
a) Cause-and-effect relationship.
b) Assumption without proof.
c) General rule applied to a case.
d) Unrelated premise introduced.
Answer: (a) because the reasoning is based on cause (rain) and effect (cancellation).
Also stay updated on CLAT Exam Date
Sample Critical Reasoning Questions for CLAT
Q1. Read the information and answer the question:
Most office spaces are situated in buildings that are between 2 to 8 floors high. Any building with more than 3 floors is equipped with a lift.
Based on this information, which of the following must be correct?
- Buildings with only 2 floors do not have lifts
- A 7th-floor office must have a lift
- Only floors above the 3rd floor are serviced by lifts
- Lifts can be used to reach all floors
Q2. Consider the passage and choose the best answer:
“Some men are clearly intelligent, while some are certainly not. But when it comes to those who fall in between, should we still call them intelligent? Yes—or perhaps no. I hesitate to give them that label.”
Which option best captures the writer’s intent?
- Describing someone as intelligent without strong evidence makes the concept too vague
- Every real-world idea carries some level of uncertainty
- Deciding whether someone is intelligent depends only on personal preference
- Unlike the writer, one should not remain so indecisive
Q3. Answer the question based on the reasoning provided:
Extracting oil offshore always involves a risk of spillage, but transporting oil in tankers carries an even higher risk per barrel. Therefore, to minimize spill risks without cutting down on oil use, more investment should go into offshore drilling and less into tanker imports.
Which statement, if true, would most strongly weaken this argument?
- Importing oil in tankers is currently cheaper than offshore drilling
- Tankers can be redesigned to significantly reduce spill risks
- Offshore drilling’s environmental damage can be controlled with careful practices
- Oil spills from tankers have historically caused more harm than those from offshore rigs
Q4. Study the situation below and answer:
From 1960 to 1970, poachers in Zinbaku killed more than 6,500 elephants, and the elephant population dropped from 35,000 to under 30,000. Anti-poaching measures introduced in 1970 led to the arrest and expulsion of 800 poachers by 1980. Yet, by 1980, the elephant count still fell to about 21,000.
Which of the following, if true, best explains this paradox?
- Arrested poachers rarely faced long prison terms
- Global campaigns against ivory reduced demand during the 1970s
- The elephant population in nearby Mombasa slightly increased in the same period
- Large areas of elephant habitat in Zinbaku were cleared for farming between 1970–1980
Q5. Refer to the statement and answer:
If highways were open only to cars and smaller trucks (below 8-ton capacity), heavy trucks would have to use alternate routes. This shift would reduce the risk of accidents on highways.
The conclusion above relies on which assumption?
- Alternate routes are convenient enough for truck drivers
- Non-highway roads cannot handle excessive truck traffic
- Most trucks currently using highways exceed the 8-ton limit
- Cars are more accident-prone on highways compared to trucks
Q6. Read the passage and answer:
People start businesses for different reasons—some want personal fulfillment, others are motivated by financial gains. Liberal tax and economic policies of the 1980s and 1990s boosted entrepreneurship and venture capital funding. Since 1990, more than 1.5 million new ventures have been launched, though not all succeeded.
The statement above assumes which of the following?
- The success of new ventures largely relies on proper financial planning
- Venture capitalists are often motivated by non-financial factors
- Social rewards inspire investors as much as profits do
- None of these
Find more about CLAT Eligibility Criteria.
Strategies for Solving CLAT Critical Reasoning Questions
To crack Critical Reasoning questions in CLAT, you need a smart approach. The right strategies not only improve accuracy but also save time during the exam.
- Active Reading: Engage with the passage instead of reading passively. Ask yourself what the author is trying to say and why. This keeps you focused and helps you remember key details.
- Identify Premises and Conclusions: Spot the main claim and the supporting evidence. Once you know the core argument, it becomes easier to evaluate its strength.
- Focus on Keywords: Pay attention to keywords that signal reasoning, like “therefore,” “however,” or “because.” They often point in the direction of the argument.
- Eliminate Wrong Options: Cross out answers that are irrelevant, too extreme, or don’t match the passage. This process of elimination makes it easier to choose the right one.
- Practice Consistently: Regular practice builds speed, sharpens accuracy, and helps you recognize question patterns quickly.
Common Mistakes to Avoid in CLAT Critical Reasoning
Even strong candidates lose marks by falling into avoidable traps. Here’s what you need to watch out for:
- Misunderstanding the Question Stem: Always read the question carefully. A small misinterpretation can lead to a completely wrong answer.
- Misinterpreting the Passage: Stick to the information given. Don’t bring in outside knowledge or assumptions unless the question specifically asks for it.
- Ignoring Assumptions: Every argument has hidden assumptions. Identifying them is key to understanding the reasoning fully.
- Accepting Arguments Blindly: Don’t take arguments at face value. Question the evidence and check if the logic really holds.
- Jumping to Conclusions: Review all answer choices before deciding. The best option isn’t always the first one that seems correct.
- Not Reviewing Options: Sometimes two answers may look similar. Reading through all choices ensures you pick the strongest response.
- Lack of Practice: Critical reasoning is a skill that improves only with consistent effort. The more you practice, the more confident you become.\
Discover the difference between CLAT vs AILET vs LSAT India
Tips for Effective Preparation for Critical Reasoning in CLAT
If you want to level up your CLAT preparation, focus on these tried-and-tested methods:
- Understand Reasoning Patterns: Study how arguments are structured and experiment with rearranging them. This builds flexibility in your thinking.
- Use Quality Study Material: Choose reliable books, online resources, and mock tests designed for CLAT. Good material helps you learn exam-focused strategies.
- Join Groups or Coaching: Studying with peers or experts gives you fresh perspectives and helps clear doubts faster.
- Simulate Exam Conditions: Practice under timed conditions to build stamina and improve time management.
- Review Your Attempts: Don’t just solve questions, analyze them. Check why an option is correct and where you went wrong. This reflection is where real improvement happens.
FAQs About CLAT Critical Reasoning
Critical Reasoning is important because law relies heavily on logical thinking and argument analysis. In real-life legal practice, lawyers constantly evaluate arguments, spot loopholes, and make decisions based on evidence. Mastering this section helps you not only score well in CLAT but also build skills crucial for your legal career.
You can improve by practicing consistently, engaging in active reading, identifying premises and conclusions, focusing on reasoning keywords, and eliminating wrong options. Regular timed practice and reviewing mistakes are also crucial.
The number of Critical Reasoning questions varies every year, but you can usually expect around 8–12 questions spread across different passages.
They can feel tricky at first because they test logical thinking instead of rote learning. With regular practice and familiarity with question types, you’ll find them manageable.
Read the passage actively, underline key points, identify assumptions and conclusions, eliminate irrelevant options, and review before finalizing your answer. Time management is key.
Books like RS Aggarwal Logical Reasoning, Arihant’s Logical Reasoning for CLAT, and previous year CLAT question papers are helpful. Online platforms and mocks are equally important.
Other important resources for CLAT Preparation:
Use the following free CLAT preparation resources by Examcharcha:
must know for clat exam
Top CLAT Coaching Programs in India: